
Which prompted a thought on third & fourth generations asTypes which I sent to the Fourth Turning forum:
. . . the generations as Strauss & Howe describe them can be given Myers-Briggs classifications I would think. What leads the Third Generation into incompetent leadership processes is that they strive to be like the First Generation. The First is formed organically in the crucible of difficulty and chaos, while the Third is a "Feeling" relationship of the Third to the First. The First wants to Survive. The Third wants to "be like" the First ("The Greatest Generation . . .", etc. - these are Feeling manifestations). For example, there is a Jonathan Chiat’s essay in the LA Times this week claiming President Bush is stupid. It misses the point. Bush is not stupid and did as well in college as John Kerry. The reason he makes bad decisions is because he is an Feeling/Introvert type trying to do the job of an Intellectual/Extrovert Type. (Had his life not been chosen for him he would have been a fine rancher or preacher.) Leadership derived thus is charicatured and not authentic.
When Introverts try to do the work of Extroverts they do it poorly and results are conspicuously caricatured, as when Extroverts try to do the work of Introverts. This runs across the political spectrum - the desire for a second Clinton, a second Dole, a second or third Bush or another Kennedy are all Feeling responses.
Fourth generation will leave this behind. Worth noting the choices of the Daily Kos crowd, most of whom are under 30: Al Gore, Howard Dean, Wesley Clark, Mark Warner - Warner is yielding; Gore is booming. All are legitimate managerial types who would appeal to Intellect/Extroverts. None are Feeling types. Good news for Gore & Clark.
No comments:
Post a Comment